Comments on: Doing good by doing well? http://www.footnoted.org/blog-reel/doing-good-by-doing-well/ Michelle Leder's guide to what's hiding in SEC filings Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:54:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Michelle Leder http://www.footnoted.org/blog-reel/doing-good-by-doing-well/#comment-3982 Michelle Leder Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:05:41 +0000 http://www.footnoted.org/blog-reel/doing-good-by-doing-well/#comment-3982 Just took a quick look and I've never written about FWLT, though the returns are clearly impressive. For whatever reason, their filings didn't flash across my radar, which in some aspects is a good thing given that gold stars are still relatively rare. Just took a quick look and I’ve never written about FWLT, though the returns are clearly impressive. For whatever reason, their filings didn’t flash across my radar, which in some aspects is a good thing given that gold stars are still relatively rare.

]]> By: John http://www.footnoted.org/blog-reel/doing-good-by-doing-well/#comment-3980 John Wed, 05 Dec 2007 07:41:17 +0000 http://www.footnoted.org/blog-reel/doing-good-by-doing-well/#comment-3980 Well... <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=FWLT&t=5y&l=on&z=l&q=l&c=jec,flr" rel="nofollow">see this</a> Well…

see this

]]> By: Michelle Leder http://www.footnoted.org/blog-reel/doing-good-by-doing-well/#comment-3943 Michelle Leder Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:46:46 +0000 http://www.footnoted.org/blog-reel/doing-good-by-doing-well/#comment-3943 Ooops -- everyone needs an editor. Thanks for being mine! Ooops — everyone needs an editor. Thanks for being mine!

]]> By: NotNasser http://www.footnoted.org/blog-reel/doing-good-by-doing-well/#comment-3942 NotNasser Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:44:10 +0000 http://www.footnoted.org/blog-reel/doing-good-by-doing-well/#comment-3942 Letters "poured" in. Pour as in water, get it? They didn't "pore in," because a "pore" is a little hole in the skin. Something might pour into a pore, but nothing pores in. Sorry, just in a pedantic mood. Letters “poured” in. Pour as in water, get it? They didn’t “pore in,” because a “pore” is a little hole in the skin. Something might pour into a pore, but nothing pores in.

Sorry, just in a pedantic mood.

]]> By: Robert Franklin http://www.footnoted.org/blog-reel/doing-good-by-doing-well/#comment-3937 Robert Franklin Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:06:12 +0000 http://www.footnoted.org/blog-reel/doing-good-by-doing-well/#comment-3937 Nice item here. However, I would reiterate your caution about determining causality here. It may be that openness does not make well-run companies, but, rather, well-run companies are open. Thanks again for the item. I love the blog! Nice item here. However, I would reiterate your caution about determining causality here. It may be that openness does not make well-run companies, but, rather, well-run companies are open.

Thanks again for the item. I love the blog!

]]>