http://www.footnoted.org/buried-treasure/a-bit-too-discreet/ Michelle Leder's guide to what's hiding in SEC filings Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:04:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 http://www.footnoted.org/buried-treasure/a-bit-too-discreet/comment-page-1/#comment-226 ML Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:49:34 +0000 http://www.footnoted.org/?p=597#comment-226 I have to agree with Sam here. While they did disclose it in DRS' S-4, it was still nearly a year after the fact. Many companies choose to disclose an informal SEC review via an 8-K. But EASI waited nearly a year before disclosing a <b>formal</b> investigation, one that holds subpoena powers. In my book, that lack of disclosure is simply unacceptable and only makes it seem like they're hiding something significant. I have to agree with Sam here. While they did disclose it in DRS’ S-4, it was still nearly a year after the fact. Many companies choose to disclose an informal SEC review via an 8-K. But EASI waited nearly a year before disclosing a formal investigation, one that holds subpoena powers. In my book, that lack of disclosure is simply unacceptable and only makes it seem like they’re hiding something significant.

]]> http://www.footnoted.org/buried-treasure/a-bit-too-discreet/comment-page-1/#comment-224 Sam Miduth Sun, 15 Jan 2006 04:20:57 +0000 http://www.footnoted.org/?p=597#comment-224 November 05 is still almost a full year after the SEC began their investigation. November 05 is still almost a full year after the SEC began their investigation.

]]> http://www.footnoted.org/buried-treasure/a-bit-too-discreet/comment-page-1/#comment-221 David Connor Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:45:35 +0000 http://www.footnoted.org/?p=597#comment-221 This information was disclosed in the S-4 filed by DRS on 23-Nov-05. This information was disclosed in the S-4 filed by DRS on 23-Nov-05.

]]>