<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Waiting for their own white knight?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footnoted.org/buried-treasure/waiting-for-their-own-white-knight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footnoted.org/buried-treasure/waiting-for-their-own-white-knight/</link>
	<description>Michelle Leder's guide to what's hiding in SEC filings</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ex-GCIer</title>
		<link>http://www.footnoted.org/buried-treasure/waiting-for-their-own-white-knight/comment-page-1/#comment-2948</link>
		<dc:creator>Ex-GCIer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footnoted.org/urge-to-merge/waiting-for-their-own-white-knight/#comment-2948</guid>
		<description>You can't trust anything out of Gannett corporate. They've been lying to employees for years, burying the truth in techno-speak. I enjoyed Dubow's dismissive "these bloggers" - isn't Gannett trying to boost their blogging profile. 
This company can't get the little things right, and when you can't get the little things right, like customer service, basic honesty to the reader and treating employees professionally, it says a lot about the top. 
To learn more about Gannett, there are some good posts at Sportsjournalists.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t trust anything out of Gannett corporate. They&#8217;ve been lying to employees for years, burying the truth in techno-speak. I enjoyed Dubow&#8217;s dismissive &#8220;these bloggers&#8221; - isn&#8217;t Gannett trying to boost their blogging profile.<br />
This company can&#8217;t get the little things right, and when you can&#8217;t get the little things right, like customer service, basic honesty to the reader and treating employees professionally, it says a lot about the top.<br />
To learn more about Gannett, there are some good posts at Sportsjournalists.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Leder</title>
		<link>http://www.footnoted.org/buried-treasure/waiting-for-their-own-white-knight/comment-page-1/#comment-2947</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Leder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footnoted.org/urge-to-merge/waiting-for-their-own-white-knight/#comment-2947</guid>
		<description>In a response posted &lt;a href="http://poynter.org/forum/view_post.asp?id=12780" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, Gannett's CEO says that the company was simply making "routine amendments to our bylaws and compensation plans." That may be. But we've certainly seen other companies trot out the words routine or, in the case of Oakley, the word &lt;a href="http://www.footnoted.org/urge-to-merge/on-housecleaning/ rel="nofollow"&gt;housecleaning&lt;/a&gt; was used to get people off the trail. If I'm wrong, I stand corrected. But this doesn't look like a routine amendment to me.

Be sure to check out some of the interesting comments on the WSJ's &lt;a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2007/08/09/is-gannett-girding-for-a-sale/#comments rel="nofollow"&gt;Dealblog&lt;/a&gt; about Gannett.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a response posted <a href="http://poynter.org/forum/view_post.asp?id=12780" rel="nofollow">here</a>, Gannett&#8217;s CEO says that the company was simply making &#8220;routine amendments to our bylaws and compensation plans.&#8221; That may be. But we&#8217;ve certainly seen other companies trot out the words routine or, in the case of Oakley, the word <a href="http://www.footnoted.org/urge-to-merge/on-housecleaning/ rel="nofollow">housecleaning</a> was used to get people off the trail. If I&#8217;m wrong, I stand corrected. But this doesn&#8217;t look like a routine amendment to me.</p>
<p>Be sure to check out some of the interesting comments on the WSJ&#8217;s <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2007/08/09/is-gannett-girding-for-a-sale/#comments rel="nofollow">Dealblog</a> about Gannett.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.footnoted.org/buried-treasure/waiting-for-their-own-white-knight/comment-page-1/#comment-2942</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 17:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footnoted.org/urge-to-merge/waiting-for-their-own-white-knight/#comment-2942</guid>
		<description>Amazing selections you cover.
This ia one tight fisted operation that loves
to grab small family owned papers. Brings the lovely 'economies of scale' to them.
Was down another buck. Now 48.37
For a $11B cap stock it is a mess to value.
7/31 Bear upped it w/ tgt @$56. 
That after Barron glowed:
Monday, July 30, 2007 06:51ET 
The following article appears in the latest edition of Barron's(tm) discussing :
"Barron's(7/30) Speaking Of Dividends: $15 Billion Gusher"
(NYSE: GCI) last traded at $48.63, down $0.66 (-1.34%), on 0 shares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing selections you cover.<br />
This ia one tight fisted operation that loves<br />
to grab small family owned papers. Brings the lovely &#8216;economies of scale&#8217; to them.<br />
Was down another buck. Now 48.37<br />
For a $11B cap stock it is a mess to value.<br />
7/31 Bear upped it w/ tgt @$56.<br />
That after Barron glowed:<br />
Monday, July 30, 2007 06:51ET<br />
The following article appears in the latest edition of Barron&#8217;s(tm) discussing :<br />
&#8220;Barron&#8217;s(7/30) Speaking Of Dividends: $15 Billion Gusher&#8221;<br />
(NYSE: GCI) last traded at $48.63, down $0.66 (-1.34%), on 0 shares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
