Morningstar ®

Footnoted is now part of Morningstar

  Text Size:   A A A

January 16, 2008 at 1:46 pm by Wendy Fried

Relaxing their standards at La-Z-Boy…

la-z.jpgAmericans can thank La-Z-Boy Inc. (LZB) for fostering our real national pastime, the one where we lounge in huge recliners watching huge flat-screen TVs. Now the company may inspire me to adopt a lazy approach to SEC filings, in which I will no longer bother reading CD&As because they may turn out to be meaningless anyway.

Forget whatever La-Z-Boy said in last year’s proxy about its long-term equity plan. In an 8-K filed Monday, the company said it was trashing the performance targets and time frames embedded in the equity grants it made last July to 120 employees, including the firm’s top management. Why? Because “based on current market conditions and the Company´s performance in the first two quarters of fiscal 2008, the performance targets in the Awards now appear to be unrealistic.”

This shows a lot of pessimism, considering the awards were supposed to be based on 3 years of performance – fiscal years 2008 through 2010. It’s not clear how much the performance targets have been lowered, since this is one of those firms that doesn’t disclose specific metrics. But while the grants in question are still labeled “long-term,” half of the awards will now be tied to La-Z-Boy’s results for the last 4 months of its current fiscal year, which ends in April.

In its last earnings release, the firm lowered its previous guidance and reported a 12% drop in net sales, blaming its troubles largely on “the decline in consumer confidence and the overall uncertain economic environment.” It’ll be interesting to see if other companies use the slings and arrows of a slowing economy as an excuse to relax their performance standards. Meanwhile, the rest of us will relax in our La-Z-Boys and watch the stock market tank.

2 Responses to “Relaxing their standards at La-Z-Boy…”

  1. vboscaino Says:

    I wonder if the company would also consider reversing the 50% loss the shareholders have seen over the last twelve months and would simply reinstate their positions at the $12/share level?

    Hey if its fair for management to redefine history on a “as needed basis”, shouldn’t the shareholders, who actually put their capital at risk to support what appears to be a highly inept management team, be entitled to the same treatment?

    Seems like the other change to the compensation system that management should be evaluating is asking for bonuses from the preceding year to be returned.

  2. Frank Graham Says:

    Citi/Merrill traders only recourse after firings will now be a hard wooden bar stool at Blarney Stone. Oops add 1300 Lehmans too, just announced.
    Nearing a Blood in the Streets bottom when your next cabby
    talks about the good old days at XYZ brokerage.