Text Size:   A A A

September 22, 2008 at 3:20 pm by Michelle Leder

Waxman weighs in…

Henry Waxman, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform just issued a statement on his take on the bailout. Here’s a snippet:

The Administration’s plan completely eviscerates the concept of moral hazard. It would enrich the Wall Street executives whose reckless investments caused the financial crisis. The taxpayer is being asked to risk billions to protect the bonuses of investment bankers. There was public outrage when the CEOs of Countrywide, Merrill Lynch, and Citigroup walked away with hundreds of millions of dollars after causing billions of dollars of losses. But what President Bush and Secretary Paulson are proposing is worse: the taxpayer will be funding million-dollar payouts on Wall Street.

Clearly, executive compensation — something we spend a lot of time talking about here on footnoted — is increasingly becoming a key issue. But setting limits of any kind will never fly and even those of us who argue that too many people are getting paid for mediocre — or worse — performance — will never work because there’s simply too many ways to define compensation. Waxman’s statement actually says no CEO whose company qualifies for financial relief should get over $2 million a year. Just to put that into perspective, Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman’s total compensation last year was just over $70 million and the five NEOs as a group took pocketed $321 million.

Time to consult the Magic Eight ball and see what it says…

5 Responses to “Waxman weighs in…”

  1. Stephen Chua Says:

    What a sweet deal for the financial brokers with this Financial Bailout Package.

    Looks like the big guys play by their own rules. One side makes a faux pas and “no problem” the league owner gives you more play money from the guys that lost it anyway…

    From many people around the world’s point of view, it’s inconceivable - how can we lose money from one hand and get hit on the other. And to rub salt into the wound, we pay through our taxes some more.

    Makes investing a really one sided affair.

    Please keep up with the commentary and I dare say it won’t end any time soon; not if other parts of the world facing similar fallouts are still grappling with it.

  2. Tommy Redcloud Says:

    The only viable solution would be to make the seizure of the private assets of the current and prior CEOs & boards of any company seeking relief as a condition of any bailout. No board would agree of course, but the current scheme screws-over both shareholders and taxpayers while letting those responsible skate off with their huge bonuses.

    Anything Congress is going to do will only make a worse mess out of the situation.

  3. rob Says:

    hmm … http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/testimony/bernanke20080923a1.htm
    Can those elected be cornered by the “appointed”?

  4. David Sachs Says:

    I’m sure Congressman Waxman will be as deeply committed to combating moral hazard when homeowners in his district demand legislation to invalidate or adjust the terms of their mortgage contracts in bankruptcy court.

  5. rob Says:

    “Adjustment” is a fallacy …
    like “0%” capital gains? …
    want “confidence”, drop the flat model.

Leave a Reply

Comments for this post will be closed on 24 March 2009.