Morningstar ®

Footnoted is now part of Morningstar

  Text Size:   A A A

December 28, 2006 at 11:09 am by Michelle Leder

Gobble, gobble…

images-11.jpegIt’s always amazing when you look at the proxy for a fairly large publicly traded company, and the related party transactions stretch on for several pages. But that’s exactly the case at Pilgrim’s Pride (PPC) which filed this proxy yesterday. Maybe it has something to do with the meat processing industry, since Tyson Food (TSN), a competitor which filed its proxy earlier in the week, also has a fairly extensive list of related transactions.

Among the more interesting disclosures in Pilgrim’s filing were the long list of interlocking business relationships between Chairman Lonnie "Bo" Pilgrim, who also happens to chair the compensation committee, and various other companies that he owns or controls. For example, there’s the $790K that Bo’s Pilgrim Poultry G.P received from the company for "chickens produced" and another $62.5K a month to rent egg production facilities. There’s also the nearly $400K the company spent to lease a plane from Bo and the $130K that Bo received in "other compensation" for his personal use of the plane. (One interesting side note here: Bo’s plane usage went up sharply last year, but the amount of money spent on providing him with a car declined). And there’s a bunch of family members that either have high-paying jobs, including three of Bo’s grown children, or other business relationships with the company.

To be fair, the $790K that Bo received for the chickens is down dramatically from the $54 million he received for similar services in 2005. But the bottom line is that companies whose market cap is in the billions shouldn’t be run like a family’s personal piggy-bank.

One Response to “Gobble, gobble…”

  1. David Harper Says:

    ohmygosh, I can’t believe this company finds shareholders. Normally, the comp committee must be entirely independent under NYSE, but he owns 60+% so it’s a so-called controlled company. They might as well be dual-class shares. And just like dual-class, the ordinary shareholder is second class. Why would anyone subordinate to a company which structurally has no incentive to operate for public shareholders. I note, thankfully, S&P CGQ gives them a governance rank of only 10th %ile. It’s fine he owns the place but it is totally unacceptable that he is even on the comp committee. Nice find…