<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Booyah: Dissecting Jim Cramer&#8217;s new contract&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footnoted.org/urge-to-merge/booyah-dissecting-jim-cramers-new-contract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footnoted.org/urge-to-merge/booyah-dissecting-jim-cramers-new-contract/</link>
	<description>Michelle Leder's guide to what's hiding in SEC filings</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill aka NO DooDahs!</title>
		<link>http://www.footnoted.org/urge-to-merge/booyah-dissecting-jim-cramers-new-contract/#comment-4866</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill aka NO DooDahs!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footnoted.org/?p=1821#comment-4866</guid>
		<description>Oh, how I long for every financial pundit to be so transparent as to write, "On the open at Monday, I'll be selling X, Y, and Z, and buying A, B, and C.   Here's why ... "

Apparently that kind of transparancy ain't for the big boys.  They hide behind charitable trusts that can't buy or sell if he's mentioned the stock on his show - BUT HIS FAMILY CAN!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, how I long for every financial pundit to be so transparent as to write, &#8220;On the open at Monday, I&#8217;ll be selling X, Y, and Z, and buying A, B, and C.   Here&#8217;s why &#8230; &#8221;</p>
<p>Apparently that kind of transparancy ain&#8217;t for the big boys.  They hide behind charitable trusts that can&#8217;t buy or sell if he&#8217;s mentioned the stock on his show - BUT HIS FAMILY CAN!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Leder</title>
		<link>http://www.footnoted.org/urge-to-merge/booyah-dissecting-jim-cramers-new-contract/#comment-4865</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Leder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footnoted.org/?p=1821#comment-4865</guid>
		<description>Exactamundo! What's interesting is that family can be defined pretty broadly when it's not defined as consisting of specific people, i.e. wife, mother, father, children. I have no idea whether Cramer has a second cousin twice removed, but technically, that could qualify here as being family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactamundo! What&#8217;s interesting is that family can be defined pretty broadly when it&#8217;s not defined as consisting of specific people, i.e. wife, mother, father, children. I have no idea whether Cramer has a second cousin twice removed, but technically, that could qualify here as being family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill aka NO DooDahs!</title>
		<link>http://www.footnoted.org/urge-to-merge/booyah-dissecting-jim-cramers-new-contract/#comment-4864</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill aka NO DooDahs!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footnoted.org/?p=1821#comment-4864</guid>
		<description>Let me get this straight, the original version said 

"I can't trade in any stocks I mention, BUT MY WIFE CAN!"

and the new version says

"I can't trade in any stocks I mention, BUT ANY MEMBER OF MY FAMILY CAN!"

How interesting ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me get this straight, the original version said </p>
<p>&#8220;I can&#8217;t trade in any stocks I mention, BUT MY WIFE CAN!&#8221;</p>
<p>and the new version says</p>
<p>&#8220;I can&#8217;t trade in any stocks I mention, BUT ANY MEMBER OF MY FAMILY CAN!&#8221;</p>
<p>How interesting &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
